Why do you think
World of Warcraft has been such a success when compared to other MMOs?
Now, World of Warcraft has shattered earlier assumptions about the potential size of the market.

I am going to say that if

Oe more, yes. However, I am going to say that if money is the issue and youan't always afford all the skills, itan be a good idea to not buy the next rank of Flamestrike or oh immediately and save theash for later. But at the end of the day, it's a bit better to have them than to not.
A pure leveling tree works well, at least until you get more points to spend. Full fire isn' thatommon (as most spend around 4748 points at most in the tree) while going full frost (51 or more points)an be fairlyommon for raidinge. I preferred frost for leveling, it still went qukly and it is fun to use, so I will leave that up to you.
Well, speaking in a general sense and not a mage sense, going purely into one treean be just as advantageous as going deep into one tree as going into a 23s, 13 hybrid, as is going into a 5050 hybrid, depending on whhlass, whh trees, and what situation. I know that it's notrazy for 0061 frost mages and 0061 resto shaman. The reason is that these trees are saturated with both great talents and good talents. On the other hand, people tend to only put 41-44ish points maximum in an elemental shaman tree bause there's some talents in the resto tree that helps them, and there's few good talents left in the elemental tree after those that they pked. You'll often find 41020 elemental shaman, and you'll find 16450 and 04516 shaman than full 0610 enhaement shaman (are there even that many talents in the enh tree?) Youan find almost pure shadow priests, and hybrid diholy priests. It's not thease in the World of Waraft that 55-61 points in only one tree is always a noobish thing to do. It's always a matter of what's where.
SIGN IN
Name:
Password:
FRIENDS
Archiv
TAGE
Copyright © armoryprice.listapart.org